OEB reviewing policy on billing load displacement customers

The Ontario Energy Board announced March 29 that it was initiating a policy review to address the

question of how a commercial and industrial customer should be billed when they have a Load Displacement Generator (LDG) behind the meter. This issue is already being considered in the policy review for distribution rates as part of the OEB’s project on Rate Design for Electricity Commercial and Industrial Customers (EB-2015-0043). The OEB will also undertake a review of the appropriate billing for other rates such as Retail Transmission Service Rates (RTSR) and other elements of the bill including the Global Adjustment (GA).

          There has been an increasing number of customers using load displacement or behind-the-meter generation facilities, the OEB explains, and this is likely to continue to increase. Larger retail customers of most distributors are currently billed for retail transmission services on the net peak demand. Similarly, all but the largest customers pay for the GA on net energy consumption as measured at their meter. This is often called net load billing.

          For wholesale transmission rates charged to distributors, the Ontario Uniform Transmission Rates Schedule states that the billing demand for line and transformation connection services include not just a customer’s net load, but also any customer load served by embedded generation facilities larger than one megawatt (or larger than two megawatts if the energy source is renewable). This is referred to as gross load billing. Gross load billing of transmission charges is also reflected in RTSRs that Hydro One charges distributors embedded in its distribution system.

          The issue of whether RTSRs should be applied on the basis of gross load, consistent with wholesale transmission rates, has recently arisen in rate applications. Guelph Hydro filed an application with the OEB requesting gross load billing for RTSRs for customers with LDG. Guelph Hydro has made this application based on its belief that if this change is not made, other classes will be paying costs that are directly related to a specific customer. Hydro One has been approved for gross load billing for its retail transmission rates. Similarly, the OEB has recently accepted Entegrus’s proposal to apply gross load billing for its larger general service classes when conditions warrant.

          The OEB says it understands that many other electricity distributors have LDG within their service area and therefore have similar situations. The OEB sees value in examining this issue on a generic basis. The OEB will be initiating work on the question of the appropriate billing for customers with LDG. More details on consultation will be provided at a later date.